Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
‘The mere presence of old people seems to be enough to turn Facebook into a social media wasteland.’
‘The mere presence of old people seems to be enough to turn Facebook into a social media wasteland.’ Photograph: oneinchpunch/Getty Images/iStockphoto
‘The mere presence of old people seems to be enough to turn Facebook into a social media wasteland.’ Photograph: oneinchpunch/Getty Images/iStockphoto

So ‘uncool oldies’ drive the young off Facebook. Well, we’ve got to hang out somewhere

This article is more than 5 years old
Barbara Ellen

There are many other and better reasons to dislike the social media platform

Another day, another report about how young people are turning away from Facebook. The report, by analysts at Kantar Media for the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University, says that, following investigations such as those in this newspaper, young people feel Facebook is polluted with “fake news”, dodgy algorithms and assaults on democracy, leading them to prefer the likes of WhatsApp (also owned by Facebook).

All valid points – many older people distrust Facebook for the same reasons. Then there’s the other big reason why younger people are rejecting Facebook, namely, older people. Asked about the site, young people used terms such as “uncool uncle”, “midlife crisis”, “egocentric” and “sociopath”. Nor do they mean central-casting Old People, clicking confusedly, sucking Nuttall’s Mintoes. They mean me and probably you too.

Indeed, for yoof, the mere presence of old people seems to be enough to turn Facebook into a social media wasteland. First, perhaps young people could consider being more generous and realise that we require somewhere to stick up our youthful “prettier” snaps in a haze of pathetic nostalgic neediness. Some of us also need to put up recent photos and hear outright lies about how we “haven’t changed!” It’s pitiful, but harmless. As are the occasional ranting posts: Trump, Brexit, Corbyn, goth jokes, general undignified, middle-aged time-wasting, usually culminating in an engulfing nuclear mushroom cloud of self-disgust and the classic “I’m leaving Facebook (feel free to talk me out of it)” post.

So a part of me understands the youthful scorn. However, another part of me wonders, why is this particular brand of social media-themed ageism acceptable? Moreover, for many Facebook users, isn’t it the very opposite of “sociopathic” – signifying a very human desire to join in?

Then there’s the other question – how are young people even aware of older people being annoying? While I don’t know anything about the likes of Twitter, Instagram or WhatsApp, one feature of Facebook is that, generally, you’re not interacting with each other unless you want to.

And while this has its own hazards, not least in terms of echo chambers, it also means that, even if I wanted to, I’d find it quite difficult to stink up Facebook for young people, with tragic old photos of young-me with crimped hair. Basically, I don’t see unknown “Young People!” on Facebook; I’m pretty sure they don’t see me either and I presume that’s the case for most users. So where’s all the derision/aversion coming from?

If the serious issues with Facebook have driven youth away, then that’s understandable. If it’s simple brand fatigue regarding the ageing Facebook concept, then fair enough. However, perhaps the next time someone asks a young person why they’re off Facebook, perhaps they could refrain from trashing the “old people” they probably never actually see. I mean, yoof, talk about being uncool.

Look, I know that painting over a Bansky isn’t funny...

What am I bid for a half a Banksy? Photograph: Ben Birchall/PA

A teashop in Bristol has lost half a Banksy artwork due to a workman mistakenly painting over the shutters on to which it was graffitied. He stopped when a passerby alerted him, but the damage was done. Arguably, it improved the art, which even Banksy fans would admit isn’t his best – more of an early daub that, from a distance, could be mistaken for a generous spray of psychedelic pigeon droppings. The teashop owners are now appealing for someone to finish the piece. Perhaps Banksy himself could do the honours? Failing that, a five-year-old with a poster-paint set, drinking straws and a spare 15 minutes.

Such is the urban guerrilla nature of Banksy’s choice of canvas, this wasn’t the first time his art had been unwittingly vandalised. A part of me can’t help but giggle when works of art are accidentally destroyed in this way. I’m not mocking the artists in question, it’s more to do with the mundane ways in which these disasters tend to occur. This time, a workman splashed paint on to some old shutters. Another time, at Charles Saatchi’s home, someone unplugged a refrigerator – to use a vacuum cleaner – causing Marc Quinn’s Self (a cast of his head in his own blood) to defrost and turn into a big red puddle.

Apologies to Quinn, but the thought of that plug being removed for some quick vacuuming makes me laugh to this day. Perhaps it’s because such incidents are witty interplays of art connecting with real life – stick with me – fusing together in perfect synchronicity to produce a statement that is part creativity, part human error-cum-catastrophe. Or, more likely, I’m a childish philistine who needs to grow up. As with all art, it’s probably best to leave it open to interpretation.

Barbara Ellen is an Observer columnist

Most viewed

Most viewed